Thursday, April 17, 2008

Ah, language!

Having studied German and Latin in my youth, I can “sort of” get around in Europe. I frequently can understand signs and menus, and when I can’t, there typically are fluent English speakers nearby. I recall trying out my German on a shopkeeper in Austria who smiled sympathetically and then said: “Let’s talk English, OK?”

Well, Chinese is so different that I have absolutely no clue what people or signs are saying. The upside is that I can ignore chatter on the street, and choose to be oblivious as to whether people are talking about me, although on the buses I sense, frequently, that they are. In fact, as a former Portuguese colony, much of the signage – on buses, in public offices, etc. – is in both Chinese and Portuguese, and by necessity, I’m learning to make sense of some Portuguese!

Foreigners’ (particularly Asian) attempts to communicate in English are often the source of politically insensitive yet very funny anecdotes. There’s even a Web site dedicated to signage of this sort. We Americans can be assured that our efforts to communicate in Japanese, or Chinese, or Thai are often equally silly, if not more so.

However, two recent incidents have been enlightening as well as amusing. First, I’ve had to impress repeatedly upon my students the need to cite their sources in the papers they write. It’s a professional courtesy to indicate where one finds information, or to provide attribution for a quote and to enable the reader to go to the source for further information. On the whole, Chinese students are not accustomed to doing this. In a recent paper submission, I was gratified to see several footnotes, and, curious to explore further a point made by the student, went to the Web site he cited – only to discover that it was in Chinese! Serves me right, I guess.

The second incident was during a recent presentation by an alumnus to students in the business school here. After introducing himself and his topic in halting English, he launched into his native Cantonese. Sitting in the front row, I considered this to be a good idea on his part, even though I couldn’t understand him. After all, the room was full of Chinese students. What I didn’t realize until later, however, was that the majority of the students were from the mainland, and spoke Mandarin (known as Putangua here). They couldn’t understand him either!

Sunday, April 13, 2008

East and West

Five years ago, I was privileged to direct the Sigmund Weis School of Business (SWSB) London Program. Now, of course, I’m with the first cohort of Susquehanna students in our exchange program with the University of Macau. As the current experience in Macau has developed, several people have asked how the two programs compare. In many respects, the programs are so different that in many dimensions they practically defy comparison.

The SWSB London Program is for junior business majors who take SU courses, only with each other, in a somewhat familiar environment, and in the world’s most expensive city. The program is highly structured, and all students enroll in the same four courses, partly so that everyone stays on track for graduation. They live with each other, go to class together and generally are together 24/7. The SWSB professor who directs the program sees them regularly, teaching one of the courses and serving as counselor and “go-to” person. Students bond with each other to an extraordinary degree and form what I am sure will be lifetime friendships. They travel in small groups all over Europe on weekends, seeing the Western heritage that most of them share. They move out of their accustomed “comfort zone” and become seasoned, competent travelers, comfortable throughout Europe. They have a ball, learn about European and international business practices, get exposed to fine arts through the Theatre course and learn mostly about their own capabilities.

The new exchange program with the University of Macau is available to all Susquehanna sophomores and juniors, who join between 50 and 80 other exchange students from around the world in taking regular courses. Like students in other study abroad programs, they work closely with their academic advisers in selecting courses that will keep them on track for graduation. The University of Macau teaches in English, and with the exception of recommended courses in Chinese culture and language, an exchange student often is the only non-Chinese student in a class. While many exchange students get to know each other well and travel together, they also get to know Chinese students, both from here in Macau and from the Chinese mainland. Food, housing, transportation and clothing are all considerably less expensive than in the U.S.

Students in Macau are more “on their own” than in the London Program. Their comfort zones are stretched farther than in London, by virtue of the fact that they are in a much different culture than the one in which they probably grew up. They study harder simply because everyone studies harder at an Asian university, and because the program attracts more serious students who are taking a large leap of faith in coming to Asia. They travel to exotic locations in Asia, but have full class schedules that limit the frequency with which they can get away from Macau. They see sights that are utterly different from what they’ve seen all their lives, from monkeys scurrying around Cambodian temples to thousands of people on motorbikes in virtually every city, to the frenzy of Hong Kong harbor, to the amazing markets selling everything from live octopi to knockoff Nike running shoes. Students in the Macau exchange program learn about Asia by being in the midst of it, from the international faculty at the university, from fellow exchange students representing over 20 countries, from Chinese people they meet as classmates and friends. And, of course, they learn mostly about their own capabilities.

Both programs are strongly supported by Susquehanna. In both, students pay regular Susquehanna tuition. In both, they receive round-trip airfare and at least two multi-day, expense-paid trips to a major venue away from London or Macau. London students typically go to Prague and Rome, taking company tours and making presentations to business executives. This semester, Macau students enjoyed a 12-day study tour to Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam, and also visited the Guilin area.

What the programs have most in common is that they are both life-changing cross-cultural immersion experiences. Students are exposed to differences, grow comfortable in a different milieu, and come to appreciate and participate in that difference. In every respect, the opportunity to study abroad is a gift, and one that too many students choose to leave unopened. My hope is that, just as the London Program has become part of the SWSB culture, the Macau exchange will similarly become part of what many SU students expect to do as part of their education. Two of the students in Macau this term participated in the SWSB London Program last fall, and at least one of the SU students here will participate in the London Program next year. Think of it, these students will complete four years of college AND will have lived in both Europe and Asia. Think how well they are preparing themselves for the global community that increasingly influences our daily lives. Think how confident they are becoming in different cultures, able to negotiate logistics that many classmates would find simply overwhelming, gaining some genuine cross-cultural understanding, and in the process understanding themselves and their own culture more deeply.

Who would not want to open a gift like this? The answer, unfortunately, is that students often don’t know what they don’t know, and aren’t sufficiently curious to go and find out. Almost always, students who take the leap of faith discover, to their amazement, that THEY can do it, that it’s not that hard, really, and that the reward is to be seeing and experiencing the broader world. In that regard, consider the following quote from Dag Hammarskjold, former Secretary General of the United Nations: “Never measure the height of a mountain until you have reached the top. Then you will see how low it was.”

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Freedom and Safety

After all of 10 weeks as a resident of Macau, China, I’ve repeatedly observed two related phenomena:
  1. This is not a free country. And it’s not a democracy. Political dissidents are swiftly and brutally repressed. The all-powerful state has a low threshold for disagreement.
  2. There is virtually no crime here. I feel safe on the streets at any time of day or night, in any location. I don’t fret for the personal safety of the eight Susquehanna students who walk in Macau and travel to other Chinese destinations.

Obviously, these are related, but I don’t know how much. I’ve observed essentially the same thing in the United Arab Emirates, although dissidents there don’t seem to be treated with such brutality as we see here. However, there are countries where people are both free and pretty safe walking around, for example in Scandinavia or The Netherlands. Thus political repression doesn’t appear to be a necessary condition for personal safety.

I’m thinking about this because I don’t feel safe walking around in U.S. cities after dark, or – in some neighborhoods – even in broad daylight. Poverty, racial tension, drugs, general hopelessness and a tough street culture all contribute to a social milieu in which personal safety is at risk, most especially for those who live there. While I look forward to returning to the land of the free, I don’t look forward to that feeling of apprehension when I park my car or get off the bus in an unfamiliar neighborhood.

Friday, April 4, 2008

Nothing But The Truth

We get news on at least three political levels here in Macau. For example, depending on the source, the recent “issues” in Tibet were: a) killer terrorists executing a heinous plot by the “Dali-clique;” b) a frustrated people who want more autonomy and religious freedom, but not independence from China; or c) the latest chapter in a history of heavy-handed and repressive responses to anything that challenges the authority of the state. We lean toward b) and c) as closer to the truth, but as Westerners, we might be expected to. Meanwhile, the Chinese-controlled press (including the English-language newspaper China Daily) repeat endlessly that the Dali Lama is behind the whole thing, that his offer to resign is both a lie and also part of his plot, and that Chinese authorities are merely trying to maintain social order.

I’ve gotten pretty fed up with the American press in recent years, and particularly with the spin doctors in Washington, D.C., who turn the Iraq tragedies into good news, and with campaign press releases that stretch the truth way beyond the truth. It has made me more suspicious of news in general and pickier about my news sources. But after reading the China press and watching the evening news here, I’m more impressed with America’s commitment to a free press and the determination of most reporters to get to the truth. There’s no pretense about a free press in China, and it makes virtually all news suspect – unless it’s about a new muffler on the local school bus.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Dubious Distinction

Years ago, when living very remotely in Montana, I was keenly aware of the state’s population density (6 per square mile, or about 2.3 persons per square km). At the time, I noticed that the tiny colony of Macau was the world’s most densely populated area, never imagining that someday I’d be living here! And enjoying it immensely! Then we moved to Pennsylvania (106 per square km), Portugal returned Macau to the People’s Republic, and I no longer paid much attention to population density statistics. Meanwhile, Macau’s land area of 15 square kilometers was practically doubled, to 28, by filling in the mud flats between the islands of Coloane and Taipa to create the Cotai Strip (get it?) where the major new casinos are being built. Game, set, and match, or so I figured.

This past Monday, the South China Morning Post carried a small article on Page A2, titled “Crowded Macau Takes Monaco’s Title.” The upshot is that while Macau’s area has grown, so has its population so that, once again, it is the world’s most densely populated region. For the record, there are 19,078 people per square kilometer here, or 49,412 per square mile. What’s more, there are several virtually uninhabited areas in Macau, with lovely – and empty – hiking trails. I’ve been on all of them and have seen fewer than a dozen other people in total. That’s good news if one likes the great outdoors, but it also implies that where people do live in Macau they are packed in pretty tightly.